Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris’s controversial Michael Brown tweets, explained

Go down

Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris’s controversial Michael Brown tweets, explained Empty Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris’s controversial Michael Brown tweets, explained

Post by phildidge on Tue Aug 13, 2019 3:36 pm

Democratic presidential candidates Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris marked the five-year anniversary of the Ferguson, Missouri, police shooting of Michael Brown last week with tweets claiming that the cop who shot Brown “murdered” the 18-year-old black man.

But the evidence, including a report released by President Barack Obama’s Department of Justice, says otherwise.

The protests in Ferguson drew national attention to the real problem of police violence and racial bias nationwide — the bigger movement Harris and Warren acknowledged with their tweets. Justice Department investigations after the shooting, though, found that the officer who shot Brown was legally justified, even if the police department that he worked in had serious problems with racial bias and violence.

The Brown shooting became a national story almost immediately on August 9, 2014, triggering protests and riots in Ferguson over accusations of racist and racially biased policing against the city’s police department. The protesters claimed, based on some eyewitness testimony, that Brown raised his hands up before Wilson shot him anyway — which gave way to the mantra of “hands up, don’t shoot.”

Warren and Harris reiterated the protesters’ narrative in two separate tweets on the five-year anniversary of the shooting, using the moment to call for action against systemic racism and police violence.


https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/8/12/20801975/elizabeth-warren-kamala-harris-michael-brown-ferguson-tweets



phildidge

Posts : 8271
Join date : 2018-11-16

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris’s controversial Michael Brown tweets, explained Empty Re: Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris’s controversial Michael Brown tweets, explained

Post by Original Quill on Tue Aug 13, 2019 4:49 pm

How was use of a firearm justified?  Brown had no gun.

The Feds don't have the jurisdiction to look into a homicide. They cannot second-guess the state authorities.  They only can look into a racially motivated crime.  They don't have the authority to say whether it was justified, or not.

The most they could say is, they found no evidence of racial motivation.

_________________
“Little thieves are hanged, but great thieves are praised.” — Old Russian proverb, offered by Vladimir Putin to Donald J. Trump, Helsinki, July, 2018.

"I don't stand by anything."  ― Donald Trump, interview with John Dickerson, 5.1.17...

Normal is broken.

“That's libertarians for you — anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.” ― Kim Stanley Robinson, Green Mars
Original Quill
Original Quill

Posts : 29453
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 54
Location : Northern California

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum