Paedophile avoids jail because of bad back

Go down

Paedophile avoids jail because of bad back

Post by Didge on Sun Nov 12, 2017 5:12 pm

A paedophile who abused three young girls more than 40-years ago has been spared jail after telling a judge he had a bad back.

John Chappell, who has a number of previous convictions for child abuse, admitted indecently assaulted the girls in the mid 1970s.

But the 60-year-old was given a suspended sentence after the judge accepted that his back problems would cause him "considerable discomfort" in prison.

Chappell, who was aged 16 or 17 at the time of the offences, indecently touched the girls - two of whom were under 14, and asked them to perform sex acts on him.

But despite being convicted of similar offences just a year later, he had escaped justice for the crimes until now.

Sentencing him at Plymouth Crown Court, Judge Ian Lawrie, said he sentencing ought to be about punishment rather than revenge.

Taking account of Chappell's curvature of the spine, Judge Lawrie said: "This would cause you considerable discomfort in prison.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/11/12/paedophile-avoids-jail-bad-back/

_________________
Human beings are born with different capacities. If they are free, they are not equal. And if they are equal, they are not free.

-- Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn.
avatar
Didge

Posts : 10416
Join date : 2016-06-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Paedophile avoids jail because of bad back

Post by Syl on Mon Nov 13, 2017 12:03 am

Whats more interesting is if this man sexually abused young teens when he was a teenager himself, has he never offended since?
Is he a paedophile or was he drawn to younger girls because he was young himself?

That doesnt make his actions any less sickening, but it would be interesting to know.

_________________
Not everyone likes me, but not everyone matters.
avatar
Syl

Posts : 15462
Join date : 2015-11-12
Location : Manchester

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Paedophile avoids jail because of bad back

Post by Original Quill on Mon Nov 13, 2017 12:58 am

Telegraph wrote:A paedophile who abused three young girls more than 40-years ago has been spared jail after telling a judge he had a bad back.

Who heard this case. Judge Moore?

_________________
“Little thieves are hanged, but great thieves are praised.” — Old Russian proverb, offered by Vladimir Putin to Donald J. Trump.

"I don't stand by anything."  ― Donald Trump, interview with John Dickerson, 5.1.17...

“That's libertarians for you — anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.” ― Kim Stanley Robinson, Green Mars
avatar
Original Quill

Posts : 23666
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 53
Location : Northern California

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Paedophile avoids jail because of bad back

Post by WhoseYourWolfie on Mon Nov 13, 2017 1:27 am

Question

Being under 18 at the time of those offences, he wouldn't have been convicted as a paedo' back then, if caught -- being a minor himself -- but under other sexual assault/carnal knowledge laws ???

So for the newspaper to label him as a paedophile, he must have been convicted as such as an adult ???

_________________
It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see.
Our life is frittered away by details. Simplify, simplify.
The mass of men lead lives of quite desperation.
Henry David Thoreau
avatar
WhoseYourWolfie

Posts : 5781
Join date : 2016-02-24
Age : 60
Location : Lake Macquarie, NSW, Australia

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Paedophile avoids jail because of bad back

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum