New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Go down

New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Ben Mothafuckin' Reilly on Mon Mar 28, 2016 6:55 pm

Members deemed by administrators to be exclusively or semi-exclusively engaged in harassing other members or disrupting the forum in general are subject to disciplinary action, including a permanent ban.
avatar
Ben Mothafuckin' Reilly
Cowboy King. Dread Pirate of the Guadalupe. Enemy of the American People.

Posts : 23823
Join date : 2013-01-19
Age : 43
Location : La Ciudad de los Chingadores, Texas

View user profile http://www.newsfixboard.com

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by eddie on Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:19 pm

Amen to that
avatar
eddie
King of Beards. Keeper of the Whip. Top Chef. BEES!!!!!! Mushroom muncher. Spider aficionado!

Posts : 34362
Join date : 2013-07-28
Age : 47
Location : England

View user profile

Back to top Go down

The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Ben Mothafuckin' Reilly on Mon Mar 28, 2016 8:54 pm

Stormee wrote:
Ben_Reilly wrote:Members deemed by administrators to be exclusively or semi-exclusively engaged in harassing other members or disrupting the forum in general are subject to disciplinary action, including a permanent ban.

Don't forget some is done and accepted as a bit of fun, wit.
I luv a laff, keepz my chuckulmuscles in trim.

That's where "deeming" comes in -- we do try to accept the post in the spirit in which it was intended.
avatar
Ben Mothafuckin' Reilly
Cowboy King. Dread Pirate of the Guadalupe. Enemy of the American People.

Posts : 23823
Join date : 2013-01-19
Age : 43
Location : La Ciudad de los Chingadores, Texas

View user profile http://www.newsfixboard.com

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by nicko on Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:34 pm

My spirit is Whiskey----hic--
avatar
nicko

Posts : 9321
Join date : 2013-12-07
Age : 77
Location : rainbow bridge

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Lord Foul on Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:36 pm

we will gladly accept a whiskey with every post you make Nicko Laughing
avatar
Lord Foul
INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR

Posts : 9305
Join date : 2015-11-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by nicko on Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:49 pm

Whisky's all gone--hic------got some vodka left---hic----hic.
avatar
nicko

Posts : 9321
Join date : 2013-12-07
Age : 77
Location : rainbow bridge

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Lord Foul on Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:51 pm

shucks Nicko...cant have vodka....the stuff makes me nasty...

a shot of that and I'll fight anyone and anything......

seriously...that stuff is pure poison for me.....

anything else and i'll quietly slide under the table after too many.....vodka....thats a different story.....
avatar
Lord Foul
INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR

Posts : 9305
Join date : 2015-11-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by veya_victaous on Tue Mar 29, 2016 12:03 am

nicko wrote:My spirit is Whiskey----hic--

Irish, Scotch, Bourbon, Tennesse, Tasmanian, Canadian, Chinese?
or is it all of the above 

Personally Canadian is my favorite, then Irish
avatar
veya_victaous
The Mod Loki, Minister of Chaos & Candy, Emperor of the Southern Realms, Captain Kangaroo

Posts : 17676
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 35
Location : Australia

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Original Quill on Tue Mar 29, 2016 1:06 am

veya_victaous wrote:
nicko wrote:My spirit is Whiskey----hic--

Irish, Scotch, Bourbon, Tennesse, Tasmanian, Canadian, Chinese?
or is it all of the above 

Personally Canadian is my favorite, then Irish

That's quite a switch. Canadian is a light whiskey. Irish is heavy-heavy...
avatar
Original Quill

Posts : 23020
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 53
Location : Northern California

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by veya_victaous on Tue Mar 29, 2016 3:45 am

Original Quill wrote:
veya_victaous wrote:
nicko wrote:My spirit is Whiskey----hic--

Irish, Scotch, Bourbon, Tennesse, Tasmanian, Canadian, Chinese?
or is it all of the above 

Personally Canadian is my favorite, then Irish

That's quite a switch.  Canadian is a light whiskey.  Irish is heavy-heavy...

I agree with the Canadian whiskey beign light, I mix it with spring water like Whiskey Coridal.
I don't know that i'd say Irish is heavy but it is different and I like the contrast and not too fruity like Bourbon can be.
I find the tutti frutti flavour of tennese whisky the least appealing.
avatar
veya_victaous
The Mod Loki, Minister of Chaos & Candy, Emperor of the Southern Realms, Captain Kangaroo

Posts : 17676
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 35
Location : Australia

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by nicko on Tue Mar 29, 2016 5:41 am

Whisky makes me Frisky,
Gin makes me sin.
Brandy makes me randy.


[Don't know about Vodka]
avatar
nicko

Posts : 9321
Join date : 2013-12-07
Age : 77
Location : rainbow bridge

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by veya_victaous on Tue Mar 29, 2016 5:53 am

vodka makes you plonkas (crazy)
avatar
veya_victaous
The Mod Loki, Minister of Chaos & Candy, Emperor of the Southern Realms, Captain Kangaroo

Posts : 17676
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 35
Location : Australia

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by nicko on Tue Mar 29, 2016 5:55 am

That don't really ryme mate.

good try though.
avatar
nicko

Posts : 9321
Join date : 2013-12-07
Age : 77
Location : rainbow bridge

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Angry Andy on Tue Mar 29, 2016 8:22 am

nicko wrote:Whisky makes me Frisky,
Gin makes me sin.
Brandy makes me randy.


[Don't know about Vodka]
Gin helps it slip in.
Rum helps me cum.
avatar
Angry Andy
Poet Laureate & Traveling Bard of NewsFix

Posts : 4306
Join date : 2013-12-14
Age : 61
Location : Getting banned is a badge of honour in the fight against far rw extremists.

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by nicko on Tue Mar 29, 2016 8:29 am

Laughing Mind below the belt again Handy?
avatar
nicko

Posts : 9321
Join date : 2013-12-07
Age : 77
Location : rainbow bridge

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by eddie on Tue Mar 29, 2016 10:05 am

I like Famous Grouse (don't know if you get that whisky in the US?)
I've tried loads - even very expensive ones - and I still like the bite of a grouse.....

avatar
eddie
King of Beards. Keeper of the Whip. Top Chef. BEES!!!!!! Mushroom muncher. Spider aficionado!

Posts : 34362
Join date : 2013-07-28
Age : 47
Location : England

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by sassy on Tue Mar 29, 2016 1:12 pm

Are mods disrupting their own thread lol
avatar
sassy

Posts : 17767
Join date : 2015-01-04

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Original Quill on Tue Mar 29, 2016 2:49 pm

veya_victaous wrote:
Original Quill wrote:

That's quite a switch.  Canadian is a light whiskey.  Irish is heavy-heavy...

I agree with the Canadian whiskey beign light, I mix it with spring water like Whiskey Coridal.
I don't know that i'd say Irish is heavy but it is different and I like the contrast and not too fruity like Bourbon can be.
I find the tutti frutti flavour of tennese whisky the least appealing.

Irish is heavy in the sense that it is peaty. Yes, Tennessee whisky is charcoal-filtered whisky. It gives off a sweet flavor. So Tennessee whiskys are quite sweet.
avatar
Original Quill

Posts : 23020
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 53
Location : Northern California

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Syl on Tue Mar 29, 2016 5:35 pm

Ben_Reilly wrote:Members deemed by administrators to be exclusively or semi-exclusively engaged in harassing other members or disrupting the forum in general are subject to disciplinary action, including a permanent ban.

If that's the case how come one member is allowed to insult, harass, bully, and threaten various posters on a daily basis, often without provocation?
I tend to ignore him most of the time and leave him and whoever wants to indulge him alone, but threads are being ruined and to be frank it's getting really boring.
avatar
Syl

Posts : 15115
Join date : 2015-11-12
Location : Manchester

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Original Quill on Tue Mar 29, 2016 5:45 pm

Syl wrote:
Ben_Reilly wrote:Members deemed by administrators to be exclusively or semi-exclusively engaged in harassing other members or disrupting the forum in general are subject to disciplinary action, including a permanent ban.

If that's the case how come one member is allowed to insult, harass, bully, and threaten various posters on a daily basis, often without provocation?
I tend to ignore him most of the time and leave him and whoever wants to indulge him alone, but threads are being ruined and to be frank it's getting really boring.

Actually, you are handling it in precisely the correct way. Look at how easily you detach yourself.
avatar
Original Quill

Posts : 23020
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 53
Location : Northern California

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Syl on Tue Mar 29, 2016 5:48 pm

Original Quill wrote:
Syl wrote:

If that's the case how come one member is allowed to insult, harass, bully, and threaten various posters on a daily basis, often without provocation?
I tend to ignore him most of the time and leave him and whoever wants to indulge him alone, but threads are being ruined and to be frank it's getting really boring.

Actually, you are handling it in precisely the correct way.  Look at how easily you detach yourself.
Well I have better things to do than humour trolls.....but to be frank he goes above and beyond being a nuisance....he is outright nasty, and when threats are made I personally think he should be stopped not simply humoured or ignored.



avatar
Syl

Posts : 15115
Join date : 2015-11-12
Location : Manchester

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Original Quill on Tue Mar 29, 2016 5:53 pm

Syl wrote:
Original Quill wrote:

Actually, you are handling it in precisely the correct way.  Look at how easily you detach yourself.
Well I have better things to do than humour trolls.....but to be frank he goes above and beyond being a nuisance....he is outright nasty, and when threats are made I personally think he should be stopped not simply humoured or ignored.

First of all, no one is to be feared. This is the Internet. Second, he's a nerd, not a threat.

People like that are insecure...casting about for a role. Add to that a lower impulse control, and the lack of introspection...and you come up with a composite of a very frightened individual.

Not a threat. A pest...but not a threat.
avatar
Original Quill

Posts : 23020
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 53
Location : Northern California

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Raggamuffin on Tue Mar 29, 2016 5:55 pm

Look, it's not that I'm frightened of his threats - do I seem like the sort of person who would be frightened of some twat on a forum threatening to harass me? It's the motive behind it, and the fact that a blind eye is turned all the time. People should be able to post on a forum without someone threatening to make them "suffer".
avatar
Raggamuffin

Posts : 30383
Join date : 2014-02-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by WhoseYourWolfie on Tue Mar 29, 2016 6:01 pm

Idea      Smile

TECHNICALLY speaking the Dodger isn't a "troll" on here...

HE'S more accurately a kind of cyber bully..


EXACERBATED by his self delusions and perverse sense of superiority.

(Just stating the obvious..   clown  ).
avatar
WhoseYourWolfie

Posts : 5607
Join date : 2016-02-24
Age : 60
Location : Lake Macquarie, NSW, Australia

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by sassy on Tue Mar 29, 2016 6:04 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:Look, it's not that I'm frightened of his threats - do I seem like the sort of person who would be frightened of some twat on a forum threatening to harass me? It's the motive behind it, and the fact that a blind eye is turned all the time. People should be able to post on a forum without someone threatening to make them "suffer".

100% agree. He can't hurt anyone because its the net, but his intention is to hurt and bully and frighten and that is what matters.
avatar
sassy

Posts : 17767
Join date : 2015-01-04

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Guest on Tue Mar 29, 2016 6:14 pm

Original Quill wrote:
Syl wrote:
Well I have better things to do than humour trolls.....but to be frank he goes above and beyond being a nuisance....he is outright nasty, and when threats are made I personally think he should be stopped not simply humoured or ignored.

First of all, no one is to be feared.  This is the Internet.  Second, he's a nerd, not a threat.

People like that are insecure...casting about for a role.  Add to that a lower impulse control, and the lack of introspection...and you come up with a composite of a very frightened individual.

Not a threat.  A pest...but not a threat.


One I am certainly not a nerd thanks Quill

Certainly not insecure like you that has to invent job roles you have never have and I just give out as much as the pack have certainly done to me today., They are like a bunch of harpies, scavenging for my eyes and liver.
Its quite pathetic really and shows how they are immature

I could list the endless abuse I have had of rags, but why bother, people have already read it themselves and why her claim and Sassy to being victims is nothing short of a joke

The mods can see that and why they are ignoring them

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Raggamuffin on Tue Mar 29, 2016 6:19 pm

Of course, yesterday when a report from Didge was ignored, he pestered and pestered until a mod gave in and did what he wanted.
avatar
Raggamuffin

Posts : 30383
Join date : 2014-02-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Guest on Tue Mar 29, 2016 6:22 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:Of course, yesterday when a report from Didge was ignored, he pestered and pestered until a mod gave in and did what he wanted.


Well I was warned also by two mods

So that makes us in the same position

I suggest you move on and nems is right, this is tiresome and boring for the rest of the forum

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Raggamuffin on Tue Mar 29, 2016 6:22 pm

Isn't "harpy" rather a sexist term?
avatar
Raggamuffin

Posts : 30383
Join date : 2014-02-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Raggamuffin on Tue Mar 29, 2016 6:24 pm

Didge wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:Of course, yesterday when a report from Didge was ignored, he pestered and pestered until a mod gave in and did what he wanted.


Well I was warned also by two mods

So that makes us in the same position

I suggest you move on and nems is right, this is tiresome and boring for the rest of the forum

I suggest you change your ways before you demand that someone else "moves on". You made numerous threats to me. If you were bluffing, well I called your bluff, and now you're whining because I pulled you up for doing exactly what you threatened to do.
avatar
Raggamuffin

Posts : 30383
Join date : 2014-02-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Guest on Tue Mar 29, 2016 6:29 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
Didge wrote:


Well I was warned also by two mods

So that makes us in the same position

I suggest you move on and nems is right, this is tiresome and boring for the rest of the forum

I suggest you change your ways before you demand that someone else "moves on". You made numerous threats to me. If you were bluffing, well I called your bluff, and now you're whining because I pulled you up for doing exactly what you threatened to do.


Again best you get over this Rags and that is my last word on the matter

You clearly have plenty of growing up to do

Bye

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Raggamuffin on Tue Mar 29, 2016 6:31 pm

Didge wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

I suggest you change your ways before you demand that someone else "moves on". You made numerous threats to me. If you were bluffing, well I called your bluff, and now you're whining because I pulled you up for doing exactly what you threatened to do.


Again best you get over this Rags and that is my last word on the matter

You clearly have plenty of growing up to do

Bye

I doubt it's your last word on the matter. I gave you the chance to retract your threats and you refused, so the fault is yours.

As for growing up - do you really think that you're a mature, sensible person? Read your own posts and you'll see that's exactly what you're not. You think you can say what you like and then expect the other person to "move on". Well I've done that before, but this time I'll move on when I'm good and ready, not when you tell me to.
avatar
Raggamuffin

Posts : 30383
Join date : 2014-02-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Lord Foul on Tue Mar 29, 2016 8:13 pm

Right....I'm going to draw a line under this....


DIDGE....in reality you SHOULD appologise to those you have threatened..its a)pointless and b) irritating.

secondly

dont EVER think you can "abuse" "threaten" or "harrass" another poster within the terms of the rules...you cant

thirdly...IF you insist on so severely criticising a faith (which of course you are entitled to) you should expect to recieve criticism back from its followers

AND...just becasue someone disagrees with you DOESNT make them the enemy, or a "target" to be harrassed...

fourthly...you DONT know everything about anything

fifthly It is NOT your place to "educate" instruct" etc anyone about anything

and finally

IF YOU EVER AGAIN ISSUE SUCH A THREAT I WILL CAN YOU IN THE BASEMENT UNTILL YOU FESTER




RAGGA....

its about time YOU realised that faith is open and subject to ridicule and criticism. The religious have had it their own way for centuries and dont like "the age of reason" one little bit....
times past the religious were the ones throwing people into jail, burning them at the stake etc...even now practicing cyber harrasment on members who lose faith....any yet you expect protection from what....valid criticism....it aint going to happen

aside from that you are not the perp here except in as much as you dont know when to shurrup... Laughing Razz

now please either kiss and make up (or at least agree to disagree) or put each other on ignore....

oh and ffs...stop the trivial pm's..... Rolling Eyes
avatar
Lord Foul
INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR

Posts : 9305
Join date : 2015-11-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Raggamuffin on Tue Mar 29, 2016 8:25 pm

Lord Foul wrote:Right....I'm going to draw a line under this....


DIDGE....in reality you SHOULD appologise to those you have threatened..its a)pointless and b) irritating.

secondly

dont EVER think you can "abuse" "threaten" or "harrass" another poster within the terms of the rules...you cant

thirdly...IF you insist on so severely criticising a faith (which of course you are entitled to) you should expect to recieve criticism back from its followers

AND...just becasue someone disagrees with you DOESNT make them the enemy, or a "target" to be harrassed...

fourthly...you DONT know everything about anything

fifthly  It is NOT your place to "educate" instruct" etc anyone about anything

and finally

IF YOU EVER AGAIN ISSUE SUCH A THREAT I WILL CAN YOU IN THE BASEMENT UNTILL YOU FESTER




RAGGA....

its about time YOU realised that faith is open and subject to ridicule and criticism. The religious have had it their own way for centuries and dont like "the age of reason" one little bit....
times past the religious were the ones throwing people into jail, burning them at the stake etc...even now practicing cyber harrasment on members who lose faith....any yet you expect protection from what....valid criticism....it aint going to happen

aside from that you are not the perp here except in as much as you dont know when to shurrup... Laughing Razz

now please either kiss and make up (or at least agree to disagree) or put each other on ignore....

oh and ffs...stop the trivial pm's..... Rolling Eyes

I shall reply to the bit addressed to me.

I do not think that my personal faith should be open to ridicule and criticism. That is harassment. If someone says to me that I'm not a Christian because they don't like my views, that is wrong. If they mock me for having faith, that is wrong. If they use my faith against me in order to harass me, that's wrong. If they say that I must be homophobic because of my faith, otherwise I'm cherry picking, that's wrong. I have never thrown anyone into jail or burnt them at the stake, and having a go at me for what others might have done in the past is wrong. That's like saying that all Muslims are responsible for terrorist attacks in the past and in the present.

avatar
Raggamuffin

Posts : 30383
Join date : 2014-02-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Raggamuffin on Tue Mar 29, 2016 8:38 pm

Oh, and Victor, I haven't sent you any PMs - not today anyway. Any I sent before today were not trivial.
avatar
Raggamuffin

Posts : 30383
Join date : 2014-02-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Lord Foul on Tue Mar 29, 2016 8:41 pm

your input is NOT appreciated stormee....

avatar
Lord Foul
INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR

Posts : 9305
Join date : 2015-11-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Lord Foul on Tue Mar 29, 2016 8:46 pm

Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes
avatar
Lord Foul
INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR

Posts : 9305
Join date : 2015-11-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Guest on Tue Mar 29, 2016 8:50 pm

Lord Foul wrote:Right....I'm going to draw a line under this....


DIDGE....in reality you SHOULD appologise to those you have threatened..its a)pointless and b) irritating.

secondly

dont EVER think you can "abuse" "threaten" or "harrass" another poster within the terms of the rules...you cant

thirdly...IF you insist on so severely criticising a faith (which of course you are entitled to) you should expect to recieve criticism back from its followers

AND...just becasue someone disagrees with you DOESNT make them the enemy, or a "target" to be harrassed...

fourthly...you DONT know everything about anything

fifthly  It is NOT your place to "educate" instruct" etc anyone about anything

and finally

IF YOU EVER AGAIN ISSUE SUCH A THREAT I WILL CAN YOU IN THE BASEMENT UNTILL YOU FESTER




RAGGA....

its about time YOU realised that faith is open and subject to ridicule and criticism. The religious have had it their own way for centuries and dont like "the age of reason" one little bit....
times past the religious were the ones throwing people into jail, burning them at the stake etc...even now practicing cyber harrasment on members who lose faith....any yet you expect protection from what....valid criticism....it aint going to happen

aside from that you are not the perp here except in as much as you dont know when to shurrup... Laughing Razz

now please either kiss and make up (or at least agree to disagree) or put each other on ignore....

oh and ffs...stop the trivial pm's..... Rolling Eyes


1) I offered the chance to apologies about bringing up my family members and she threw that in my face

2) How can i actually threaten anyone on here, lets be realistic and stop being silly here? If words can hurt , then the person should not be here in the first place and that is a reality, as we are all grown up enough and give out abuse nilly willy when the time chooses
So lets have some really honest as I can claim bullying daily from the pack of wolves that they are, but I do not. That certainly is harassing and clearly with one intent to get me banned. Though if that means not saying I am going to get someone back which is essentially what you are saying, then that should carry to any poster intentionally going after people?
Correct?
So happy to oblige but a very silly point in reality

3) I happily receive abuse back and did not even complain about this today, maybe you can actually show where I did?

4) The most irrelevant point you made which has absolutely nothing to do with any of this. I again am one of the few to ever admit when I am wrong, and actually apologise. I would like you to actually show others who do so and apologise?
So that is really patronizing and down right poor on your part.

5) Its not your place to tell me how to debate either. If people take issue, then that is their problem and again, then they should not be here. You often come down hard calling lefties this that and the other. So I think you are hardly in a position to offer advice on that front.
So in the future if you want to offer me advice dont treat me like some school kid, try and be professional and offer this advice personally, as all you are doing is speaking down to me, which if I did to you, then you would tell me to get stuffed

Fair enough?


All you had to say was lets be adult and apologise to each other and move on

So in the spirit of this forum, I apologise for any wrong Rags has felt insult by

Again I have no hate for anyone here as I do not know any of you in real life and would not wish hate to any here. I have said this countless many times.

I think this also needs extending out to some other posters who only came online today to also stir, which I think a private PM is sufficient, thus saving and more ongoing issues.

Now I have said my peace

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Guest on Tue Mar 29, 2016 9:08 pm

Oh and one last point, I never said a thing or reported to you at all when I was threatened yesterday by a poster who claimed to know my identity and was going to reveal it to Victor by PM. Not that they even know my identity, or how countless people here are so fixated on my job, the hours I do, who I am with etc. So be sure to show balance when if you claim threats are issued or that people should get a life and not be so fixated on who I am in person, as that is my buisness and nobody else.
That is what is the most childish aspect here by posters.

Now have a good evening everyone


Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Lord Foul on Tue Mar 29, 2016 9:20 pm

Didge wrote:Oh and one last point, I never said a thing or reported to you at all when I was threatened yesterday by a poster who claimed to know my identity and was going to reveal it to Victor by PM. Not that they even know my identity, or how countless people here are so fixated on my job, the hours I do, who I am with etc. So be sure to show balance when if you claim threats are issued or that people should get a life and not be so fixated on who I am in person, as that is my buisness and nobody else.
That is what is the most childish aspect here by posters.

Now have a good evening everyone


and that was wrong too didge..

however as you well know it would not have mattered one jot

I treat all personal information that is revealed...no matter HOW it is revealed as confidential....

and had he done so I would have banned him for "doxing" in any case.....


avatar
Lord Foul
INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR

Posts : 9305
Join date : 2015-11-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by HoratioTarr on Tue Mar 29, 2016 9:24 pm

Didge wrote:Oh and one last point, I never said a thing or reported to you at all when I was threatened yesterday by a poster who claimed to know my identity and was going to reveal it to Victor by PM. Not that they even know my identity, or how countless people here are so fixated on my job, the hours I do, who I am with etc. So be sure to show balance when if you claim threats are issued or that people should get a life and not be so fixated on who I am in person, as that is my buisness and nobody else.
That is what is the most childish aspect here by posters.

Now have a good evening everyone


It's amusing watching you change tune now you've had those knuckles rapped.   Perhaps now, you might stop harping on about who I am, what a coward I am for not revealing who I am, and assuming I'm other posters.
avatar
HoratioTarr

Posts : 7881
Join date : 2014-01-12

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Guest on Tue Mar 29, 2016 9:27 pm

And there is a prime example of someone not moving on and holding childish grudges

Horatio, if you had not noticed, peace is being attempted here and you are not helping.

This was about my real identity, not some forum identity, far removed
So let me be as blunt as possible to you

I hardly need advice from someone who acts immature as you did above

If you want to show the right way, then lead by example and stop shit stirring

@ Point taken Victor

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by HoratioTarr on Tue Mar 29, 2016 9:40 pm

Didge wrote:And there is a prime example of someone not moving on and holding childish grudges

Horatio, if you had not noticed, peace is being attempted here and you are not helping.

This was about my real identity, not some forum identity, far removed
So let me be as blunt as possible to you

I hardly need advice from someone who acts immature as you did above

If you want to show the right way, then lead by example and stop shit stirring

@ Point taken Victor

I'll give it two weeks before you kick off again.
avatar
HoratioTarr

Posts : 7881
Join date : 2014-01-12

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Lord Foul on Tue Mar 29, 2016 9:40 pm

shurrup......
avatar
Lord Foul
INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR

Posts : 9305
Join date : 2015-11-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Lord Foul on Tue Mar 29, 2016 9:41 pm

THREAD LOCKED
avatar
Lord Foul
INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR

Posts : 9305
Join date : 2015-11-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum